Years of market sluggishness and aggressive enlargement by huge companies imply huge offers of the previous had been possible a prelude to extra acquisitions in 2025, Intel survey outcomes and interviews counsel.
This report is out there solely to subscribers of Inman Intel, the info and analysis arm of Inman providing deep insights and market intelligence on the enterprise of residential actual property and proptech. Subscribe in the present day.
Fee lawsuits and battles involving the Nationwide Affiliation of Realtors have dominated latest headlines. However quietly within the background, one thing else was additionally occurring: Main acquisitions and mergers.
Excessive-profile examples embody Compass shopping for Latter & Blum in April and @properties Christie’s Worldwide Actual Property in December, in addition to Howard Hanna merging with House Specialists Realty final month. These and related tales elevate a number of questions: Will equally huge acquisitions proceed this 12 months? What varieties of firms will do the buying, and what sorts might be wolfed up?
In different phrases, was 2024 a prelude or a postscript to the consolidation story?
TAKE THE INMAN INTEL INDEX SURVEY FOR FEBRUARY
To search out out, Intel contacted trade consultants — for each on- and off-the-record talks — and surveyed brokerage leaders in our newest Inman Intel Index survey.
The takeaway from these efforts is that quite a lot of components are converging to doubtlessly make 2025 a banner 12 months for mergers and acquisitions. Put one other method, there’s a very good likelihood that 2024 was the truth is only a prelude.
However on the similar time, not everyone seems to be more likely to be a victor on this story. As an alternative, huge and highly effective firms which have a observe document of succeeding in lean instances would be the ones making essentially the most headlines for M&A offers this 12 months.
Most brokerage leaders aren’t centered on M&A
In January, Intel requested brokerage leaders to rank mergers and acquisitions on a scale of 1 to 5. One indicated that M&A was not on their radar, whereas 5 indicated that imminent discussions had been happening. The outcomes recommended that mergers and acquisitions should not particularly excessive on the precedence checklist for most of the practically 200 brokerage leader-respondents.
Practically 47 p.c of survey respondents chosen one, that means M&A will not be on their radar. One other 12 p.c chosen two, equally indicating that M&A is a low precedence.
Solely 8 p.c of respondents chosen 5, with one other 12 p.c choosing 4 — responses indicating that M&A is a serious precedence.
Outcomes had been related when Intel requested leaders about M&A in 12 months. In that case, 36 p.c of respondents chosen one — which once more on this query meant the subject is “not on the radar” — and one other 16 p.c chosen two. Solely 11 p.c of respondents chosen 5.
Acquisitions movement to the massive firms
None of this implies, nonetheless, that mergers and acquisitions received’t be an enormous deal this 12 months. The truth is, everybody who spoke with Intel for this story predicted important M&A information within the coming months.
“I feel it’ll be a really lively 12 months,” Chris Heller, president of OJO/movoto.com, informed Intel in a remark that captured a broader sentiment. “I feel a whole lot of firms wish to develop and I feel we’ll see a whole lot of exercise.”
The takeaway, then, is that M&A is probably not evenly distributed; en masse, acquisitions is probably not on each radar, however its a subject that’s very a lot on the radar of some huge gamers.
The consultants supplied a number of causes that 2025 could be lively for M&A.
A gradual market has put stress on smaller firms for a number of years now.
“You’re going to see firms principally saying I don’t see a method out of this and I wish to money my chips in,” Russ Cofano, CEO of Collabra Expertise, informed Intel.
“Because the trade goes via difficult instances, you are inclined to see a whole lot of consolidation,” Heller stated.
Bigger firms similar to Compass have managed to develop regardless of a gradual market.
Compass, for instance, reported progress in each income and agent rely within the first three quarters of 2024.
EXp’s agent rely progress largely remained stalled in 2024, however the firm did report income features within the first three quarters of final 12 months.
“The massive firms most likely really feel like they’ve weathered the storm,” Heller stated. “They’re not taking a look at 2025 as, ‘let’s simply get to the opposite aspect.’ They’re taking a look at 2025 as, ‘now we now have to develop.’”
“With the massive gamers, that is a part of their technique, they’re actively taking a look at methods to develop their firms with acquisitions,” Cofano stated. “Versus the smaller firms that could be extra opportunistic in the way in which they method an acquisition, via relationships at native ranges.
Cloud-based firms similar to eXp, LPT, and Actual are rising and have leaner operations than conventional brokerages. Some M&A might consequently happen as conventional operations search for entry to these enterprise fashions.
The Actual Brokerage, for instance, reported final fall that its agent rely exploded by greater than 2,000 between July and October.
“It’s practically inconceivable for a standard brick-and-mortar firm to out of the blue turn out to be cloud based mostly,” Cofano stated. “They virtually must kill their previous mannequin.”
Non-public fairness firms have been sitting on the sidelines for the final a number of years.
“Quite a lot of the acquisitions are going to be from personal fairness,” Ben Kinney, co-founder of Place, which made 5 acquisitions final 12 months. “They’re sitting on monumental buckets of money that they haven’t been capable of deploy. They’re in search of alternatives and my cellphone is ringing off the hook.”
Kinney additionally stated that capital markets might give more cash this 12 months to “robust firms,” placing them in a “place to gobble up the weaker ones.”
Brokers are most eager about making acquisitions
Intel additionally requested brokerage leaders who do have M&A on their radars what varieties of offers they may think about. Most indicated they’re extra eager about gobbling up rivals than they’re in being wolfed up themselves.
A plurality of respondents, or 48 p.c, stated their brokerage buying a competitor of their market was one thing their management groups would think about this 12 months.
The second hottest response, at 38 p.c, pointed to their agency making an acquisition to increase into a brand new market.
Solely a complete of 23 p.c indicated their management crew could be open to promoting, both with that crew staying in place or with them leaving.
The robust survive
Ongoing market stress means one sort of acquisition that will turn out to be widespread this 12 months will contain firms that haven’t but found out the brand new regular.
“On the skin they could not appear like they’re struggling, however they possible are,” Heller stated of some acquisition targets. “Issues aren’t bettering on the charge they want them too.”
“For any actual property brokerage or model, the important thing measure of success is what number of nice actual property brokers you appeal to and retain,” Marc King, former president of Keller Williams, informed Intel. You develop otherwise you go backward, there is no such thing as a stasis. Thus, any firm not prepared to evolve, develop and enhance its worth to the native agent will possible be a goal of acquisition.”
Nevertheless, the splashiest offers may very well contain firms which can be thriving.
“In these situations the businesses being acquired must see a 1+1=3 state of affairs,” Cofano stated. “They’re not firms which can be essentially financially struggling or really feel like they don’t have a path ahead. However they really feel like with the acquisition, they and their brokers can do financially higher with new possession and sources and scale and all these issues {that a} bigger group can present.”
Kinney additionally pointed to money movement constructive firms — suppose regional brokerages or title companies — as doable acquisition targets. “These firms are offered to personal fairness companies, public firms, or different worthwhile personal companies buying and selling on a a number of of EBITDA.”
Trickle down economics
Although Intel survey questions centered on brokerage leaders, proptech got here up repeatedly in Intel’s conversations for this story. And the concept is that for all the difficulty the market has given brokerages, it has been no less than as unhealthy for a lot of proptech companies who become profitable from actual property professionals — professionals who in today might have a lot much less money. The result’s that 2025 could also be a interval of winnowing for the proptech world as firms merge in an effort to outlive, or to chop losses on the eleventh hour.
In different phrases, proptech might turn out to be floor zero for actual property M&A in 2025.
“There’s a lot of startups that launched within the final 5 years which can be within the stage the place in the event that they’re not worthwhile they’re going to be targets,” Heller opined. “In the event that they aren’t profitable find a house then they usually instances merge with different firms.”
Kinney famous that in tech there could also be firms which have “unhealthy product match and low income,” during which case “these firms are sometimes fireplace gross sales, bought for scraps by smaller firms trying to create new income streams or increase their very own numbers.”
Different firms might have good merchandise, however battle with income progress. “These firms are acquired via a mixture of money and inventory, providing founders a possibility to have an even bigger win with the buying firm,” Kinney additionally stated. “They’re sometimes purchased by firms searching for to increase their buyer base or product strains.”
Methodology notes: This month’s Inman Intel Index survey was performed Jan. 21-Feb. 4, 2025, and acquired 652 responses. Your entire Inman reader group was invited to take part, and a rotating, randomized collection of group members was prompted to take part by e mail. Customers responded to a sequence of questions associated to their self-identified nook of the true property trade — together with actual property brokers, brokerage leaders, lenders and proptech entrepreneurs. Outcomes mirror the opinions of the engaged Inman group, which can not at all times match these of the broader actual property trade. This survey is performed month-to-month.
E-mail Jim Dalrymple II
