Think about ending highschool and realizing that it doesn’t matter what path you are taking — faculty, a job, or beginning a enterprise — your cash doesn’t go so far as it ought to. Your automotive mortgage is dearer, hire retains rising, and groceries value extra month-to-month. In the event you go to varsity, tuition is greater; in case you don’t, extra of your paycheck disappears in taxes. This isn’t simply unhealthy luck — it’s the results of reckless authorities spending that fuels inflation, drives up rates of interest, and makes it tougher for everybody to get forward.
In fiscal 12 months 2023, federal funds to state and native governments totaled $1.1 trillion, almost one-fifth of all federal spending and 4 % of US GDP. This cash doesn’t come free — it’s taken from taxpayers, borrowed from future generations, or printed by the Federal Reserve, creating inflation.
Even states that declare to be fiscally conservative are hooked on federal cash. Texas took in $102 billion for its 2024-2025 funds, almost one-third of its whole funds. Which means Texas, like all states that common 36 % of their funds from federal funds, is very tied to federal mandates for what it desires to do.
The largest driver of this dependency is Medicaid, which obtained $616 billion in federal spending in 2023, over half of all federal funds to states. Many states expanded Medicaid with momentary federal funds, however when Washington inevitably pulls again, states will probably be pressured to lift taxes, minimize companies, or each, burdening many households. The identical sample applies to federally backed training and transportation spending.
The extra states depend on Washington, the much less management they’ve over their insurance policies.
This isn’t nearly wasteful spending — it straight hits American households. Extra deficit spending contributes to greater rates of interest, making mortgages, scholar loans, and automotive funds dearer. The Fed shopping for Treasury debt to maintain rates of interest decrease by rising the cash provide creates inflation, forcing households to stretch their scarce budgets additional.
Each greenback the federal authorities spends on state packages is taken from the economic system, the place companies and people might have put it to much more productive use. The continued funds struggle in Washington makes one factor clear: states can’t depend on federal funds ceaselessly.
By the Division of Authorities Effectivity (DOGE), President Trump and Elon Musk have began freezing wasteful grants and pointless spending — steps that ought to have occurred way back. Critics declare that is an overreach, however the true situation is many years of reckless spending resulting in a $36 trillion nationwide debt and a Congress unwilling to behave.
The Keynesian concept that authorities spending fuels progress is a fable. Milton Friedman warned that spending is a price, not a profit. Each greenback Washington spends is taken from the productive personal sector, the place actual wealth and innovation are created. Extra authorities spending crowds out personal funding, reduces productiveness, and leaves taxpayers with greater prices.
States which are probably the most depending on federal support — Louisiana, Alaska, and New Mexico, the place over 50 % of income to cowl their budgets comes from Washington — additionally are inclined to have a few of the weakest economies. The extra states depend on federal funds, the much less incentive they need to hold taxes low, minimize rules, and encourage personal funding.
Trump’s spending freezes have upset politicians who rely upon federal funds to prop up bloated budgets, however the true situation is that states allowed themselves to change into dependent.
Excluding federal funds, state spending has grown by 61.1 % from 2014 to 2023, far outpacing the 31 % in compounded inhabitants progress plus inflation. However in fact, a lot of that state spending enhance is matched by as a lot, if no more, in federal funds, creating perverse incentives for states to spend extra. However excluding federal funds from state spending over that decade helps to take away a lot of the rise in federal funds to states for these states that expanded Medicaid. In the end, had states saved their spending in verify, they might have saved taxpayers $454 billion in 2023.
With Washington going through a rising debt disaster, states should act now to arrange for much less federal funding.
That begins with transparency — understanding precisely how a lot cash comes from Washington, the place it goes, and which packages will probably be in danger when federal {dollars} dry up. Then, states should rein in spending, get rid of inefficiencies, and take again management over training, healthcare, and transportation so they don’t seem to be on the mercy of federal strings.
Some states are already transferring in the precise path.
Almost a dozen — together with Oklahoma, Louisiana, Iowa, Texas, and Florida — have launched a DOGE to show waste and inefficiency. Oklahoma’s Division of Authorities Effectivity has already uncovered tens of millions in pointless spending, offering accountability for spending with taxpayer cash.
Lengthy-term spending aid, nevertheless, requires Congress and state legislatures to behave. Whereas Trump and DOGE are taking steps, solely Congress could make these cuts everlasting. With out legislative motion, future administrations might reverse spending freezes. Lawmakers who declare to be fiscal conservatives should show it.
Some states have already proven that spending restraint works. Alaska, Colorado, North Dakota, Oklahoma, and Wyoming have saved their complete funds progress beneath inflation and inhabitants progress during the last decade, making certain taxpayers aren’t overburdened. Others, like Louisiana, Massachusetts, and North Carolina, have slowed state spending progress beneath this key fee however stay too depending on federal funds that grew extra quickly.
The Sustainable Funds Venture by Individuals for Tax Reform discovered that if governments had capped federal and state spending progress at inhabitants progress and inflation, taxpayers might have saved $2.5 trillion in 2023. That cash might have been invested in companies, used to create jobs, or saved for the long run. As a substitute, extreme spending has made our lives harder.
Rising rates of interest and nationwide debt will ultimately power Congress to cut back spending, leaving states with two painful decisions: huge tax hikes or extreme service cuts. There are not any extra excuses. Congress should spend much less. To organize for this inevitability, states should spend much less, reject federal cash with strings hooked up, and embrace free-market ideas earlier than it’s too late.
