A US judge ordered Apple (AAPL) to immediately decrease its App Store fees and asked for criminal prosecutors to review the company’s alleged “cover-up,” jeopardizing billions in revenue for the tech giant.
US District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, in a blistering 80-page decision, said Apple circumvented her 2021 order that was first issued in an antitrust case brought by “Fortnite” developer Epic Games. That order said Apple must allow App Store developers to direct customers to app purchases outside the store.
“Effective immediately Apple will no longer impede developers’ ability to communicate with users nor will they levy or impose a new commission on off-app purchases,” wrote Gonzalez Rogers, a judge of the US District Court for the Northern District of California.
She accused the tech giant’s vice president of finance, Alex Roman, of lying under oath during testimony before the court in February and referred the case to state criminal prosecutors to investigate whether criminal contempt proceedings would be appropriate.
Internally at Apple, the judge added, Apple fellow Phillip Schiller had advocated for Apple to comply with her 2021 injunction, but that was ignored by CEO Tim Cook.
“Cook chose poorly,” Gonzalez Rogers wrote.
Her mandate raises new questions about the financial impact on a major revenue stream for Apple as the tech giant prepares to report second quarter earnings after the bell on Thursday.
The iPhone maker, which holds roughly 19% of the global smartphone market, earns fees on in-app purchases created by iOS app developers.
The Ninth Circuit said in a court document that the App Store generated an estimated $100 billion in annual revenue. As of February 2025, the store hosted roughly 2 million downloadable apps.
In 2024, according to Statista, the store earned nearly $92 billion globally, a 14% increase over 2023.
The legal drama that unfolded this week started in August 2020, when Epic first challenged Apple with a lawsuit.
It was eventually decided in part in Apple’s favor, finding that the company did not hold a monopoly in the market for “digital mobile gaming transactions.”
However, in a major victory for Epic — and app developers at large — the judge held that anti-steering provisions contained in the App Store’s rules violated California’s antitrust law.
Essentially, Gonzalez Rogers’ 2021 order said Apple must allow developers to include links and buttons in their apps that can lead users to pay for in-app purchases outside the App Store.
Story Continues
![Findings issued by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple, Inc. on April 30, 2025, US District Court Northern District of California, showing an appendix to a draft November 15, 2021 Apple presentation in which Apple details three different “[w]arning Options]()
