As outlined contribution (DC) plans proceed to evolve, plan sponsors face rising complexity in managing retirement advantages. With $12.5 trillion in property (3Q 2024) and accounting for one-third of all US retirement property, DC plans carry vital duty for guaranteeing sturdy monetary outcomes for contributors1. In 2025, plan sponsors should deal with optimizing funding methods, decreasing prices, and enhancing participant training to enhance retirement readiness.
The highest priorities for DC plans in 2025 embody vital areas equivalent to goal date fund choice, charge transparency, funding lineup analysis, and staying forward of regulatory and litigation tendencies.
Concentrating on Goal Date Funds (TDFs)
The Division of Labor’s steerage, Goal Date Retirement Funds — Ideas for ERISA Plan Fiduciaries, outlines finest practices for TDF selection2. Key takeaways embody:
Establishing a course of for choosing and evaluating TDFs and for periodic assessment
Understanding the TDFs’ underlying investments and the glidepath
Reviewing the TDFs’ charges and funding bills
Profiting from all out there info within the assessment and decision-making course of
Documenting the method
Growing efficient worker communications.
Implicit on this steerage are three key factors to think about. First, as with every funding course of, it is very important perceive the aim of the investments is to assist your distinctive group of staff make investments for retirement. Second, analyze the traits of the workforce by gathering workforce demographics, funding behavioral tendencies — generally present in experiences produced by the recordkeeper — and different workforce information. Lastly, set up the plan sponsor’s targets for the plan and general funding beliefs that may function a information when evaluating numerous TDFs. Making prudent funding choices requires these parts to drive the evaluation and determine TDFs which are appropriate on your workforce.
Understanding Funding Charges and Share Courses
We regularly see conditions the place the plan sponsor goes by the hassle of discovering a terrific funding technique after which selects a less-than-optimal funding automobile.
For instance, a plan sponsor or its advisor would possibly choose a mutual fund share class for which the expense ratio consists of revenue-share {dollars}, that are paid to the advisor or collected by the recordkeeper to credit score in opposition to its charges, moderately than utilizing a zero-revenue share class. In different instances, a plan is perhaps eligible (meet the minimal funding threshold) for a collective funding belief (CIT) automobile with a decrease expense ratio than the mutual fund model(s) of the funding technique. Typically, these decisions or oversights end in plan contributors paying larger funding charges and recordkeeper charges than if the plan sponsor had optimized the selection of funding automobile.
We advise plan sponsors contemplate the impression on contributors of their present mutual fund share courses, if not zero income, and whether or not the plan qualifies for identical CIT technique. We suggest plan sponsors use zero-revenue share courses of mutual funds or collective funding trusts, as relevant, as they supply better charge transparency and infrequently decrease general charges, all else equal, than plans using revenue-sharing share courses.
Evaluating Funding Lineup Construction
Most committees’ routine funding evaluations comply with the same format: a have a look at the economic system and capital markets adopted by a assessment of the efficiency and threat metrics of the funding menu. If there are funds on watch or in want of substitute, adjustments are mentioned. Whereas routine evaluations of plan fiduciaries are anticipated, we advise supplementing with a periodic assessment of the funding lineup construction, that means funding classes (Determine 1) and whether or not they’re carried out with lively administration or passive administration. We advise such a assessment a minimum of each three years or earlier if workforce demographics change in a significant means.
Determine 1: Common Funding Construction.
In Determine 1, we present a generic funding lineup construction. To judge the appropriateness of the lineup construction, plan sponsors ought to begin by plotting the present funding menu utilizing the columns proven. This visualization can facilitate dialogue about whether or not the present construction is acceptable or whether or not funding classes needs to be altered. Components for the dialogue may embody participant group funding information, age, demographics, and extent of retiree inhabitants within the plan.
Providing Complete Monetary Training Sources
In our 2024 Monetary Wellness within the Office Research, staff reported spending a minimum of three hours per week worrying about private funds, with 68% stating that monetary stress negatively impacts their psychological well being. And three out of 4 employers acknowledged that employees’ monetary stress negatively impacts office operations3.
We now have seen firsthand how monetary wellness advantages can assist staff enhance their monetary well being and scale back these challenges. Whereas conventional group conferences have traditionally performed a major position — notably for workforces the place a big proportion of the inhabitants will not be at a desk – there’s a significant enhance within the variety of plan sponsors and their staff searching for individualized one-on-one conferences with monetary educators. These non-public conferences allow staff to have candid conversations about their distinctive monetary challenges.
Inspecting Committee Construction and Duties
Employment tendencies from “the nice resignation” to “the massive keep” and “the nice reshuffling” illustrate the mobility of at present’s workforce. These adjustments additionally negatively impression an organization’s retirement plan committee. Causes would possibly range from altering positions to leaving the corporate or retirement.
Committees ought to get again to the fundamentals in 2025 by doing the next:
Doc the committee construction and duties
Construct an onboarding training guidelines for brand new committee members
Keep a calendar construction for fiduciary persevering with training
Affirm the fiduciary file is updated, together with the funding coverage assertion, government summaries, and funding reporting
Monitoring Developments in Litigation and Regulation
With vital provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Job Acts expiring on the finish of 2025, there may be the potential for brand new tax laws. Modifications to tax-advantaged retirement packages can include tax laws, so it is going to be vital for plan sponsors to remain present on potential adjustments.
From a litigation standpoint, two main tendencies formed 2024: plan charges and utilization of forfeiture property.
Plan charges stay a perennial focus. Has the committee fulfilled its fiduciary responsibility to observe plan bills in order that they’re affordable for the providers supplied? You will need to notice that this matter covers each vendor bills, equivalent to recordkeeping and advisor bills, and funding administration bills, equivalent to selection of funding supervisor or the share class utilized.
The present wave of litigation concerning utilization of forfeiture property is a brand new phenomenon. The litigation has targeted on whether or not plan sponsors are permitted to make use of forfeiture property to scale back employer contributions, or if they’re restricted to paying permissible vendor bills or distributing the funds to participant accounts.
With the potential for change and continued uptick in litigation, plan sponsors ought to collaborate with their advisors to remain on high of those and different tendencies in regulation and litigation in 2025.
Plan sponsors play a pivotal position in shaping the monetary way forward for thousands and thousands of staff. By prioritizing funding optimization, price effectivity, governance, and participant training, they will improve retirement outcomes and scale back fiduciary dangers. As market situations, workforce demographics, and regulatory landscapes evolve, steady evaluation and strategic decision-making will likely be key to making sure DC plans stay efficient, aggressive, and aligned with participant wants. By specializing in these six priorities, plan sponsors can drive significant impression in 2025 and past.
Disclosures
The fabric offered herein is of a common nature and doesn’t represent the supply by PNC of funding, authorized, tax, or accounting recommendation to any particular person, or a suggestion to purchase or promote any safety or undertake any funding technique. The data contained herein was obtained from sources deemed reliable. Such info will not be assured as to its accuracy, timeliness, or completeness by PNC. The data contained and the opinions expressed herein are topic to alter with out discover.
The PNC Monetary Companies Group, Inc. (“PNC”) makes use of the advertising identify PNC Institutional Asset Administration® for the varied discretionary and non-discretionary institutional funding, trustee, custody, consulting, and associated providers supplied by PNC Financial institution, Nationwide Affiliation (“PNC Financial institution”), which is a Member FDIC, and funding administration actions carried out by PNC Capital Advisors, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of PNC Financial institution. PNC doesn’t present authorized, tax, or accounting recommendation until, with respect to tax recommendation, PNC Financial institution has entered right into a written tax providers settlement. PNC Financial institution will not be registered as a municipal advisor underneath the Dodd-Frank Wall Road Reform and Client Safety Act.
“PNC Institutional Asset Administration” is a registered mark of The PNC Monetary Companies Group, Inc. Investments: Not FDIC Insured. No Financial institution Assure. Might Lose Worth. ©2025 The PNC Monetary Companies Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
